<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LivingDice.com &#187; of</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livingdice.com/tag/of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livingdice.com</link>
	<description>Gaming. It&#039;s in the blood...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>My Vision for the New 4E Game System License (GSL)</title>
		<link>http://www.livingdice.com/1206/my-vision-for-the-new-4e-game-system-license-gsl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.livingdice.com/1206/my-vision-for-the-new-4e-game-system-license-gsl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>trask</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4th Edition Dungeons and Dragons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules.legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wizards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wotc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingdice.com/?p=1206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wizards of the Coast has yet to release the new &#8220;Game System License&#8221; for the 4th Edition D&#38;D rules and I am tired of waiting for Moses to come down from the mountain. I want to kick-start the process, so I decided to post some ideas that WOTC hopefully will incorporate into the new version. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wizards of the Coast has yet to release the new &#8220;Game System License&#8221; for the 4th Edition D&amp;D rules and I am tired of waiting for Moses to come down <img src="http://www.livingdice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/185aece1-61b5-4320-af80-8c04cdb2ef82.jpg" border="0" alt="185AECE1-61B5-4320-AF80-8C04CDB2EF82.jpg" width="340" height="134" align="right" />from the mountain. I want to kick-start the process, so I decided to post some ideas that WOTC hopefully will incorporate into the new version. Will it make any difference? Probably not, but it makes me feel better and it is my way of predicting what will be in the final version.</p>
<p>For those coming late to the party the GSL is the license that WOTC makes 3rd party publishers sign before they can sell anything that uses the 4E D&amp;D system. You should read the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wizards.com/d20/files/GSL_20080617.pdf">original GSL</a>. It provides some context for my suggestions. If you are not interested in reading a legal document or old blog posts to catch up on the GSL controversy , let me sum it up for you: it is an evil document. Incredibly unpopular with publishers and pulled within a few weeks of release for &#8220;revision.&#8221;</p>
<p>Let us move past this old document to the new, &#8220;Trask Built&#8221; version.</p>
<p>{Lots of Legal Boilerplate, on to the good stuff }</p>
<p><strong>1. Wizards will notify all signatories of any changes to the GSL by mail. </strong></p>
<p>No, this is not a major burden for Wizards. I personally contacted/visited most of the RPG companies in the English-speaking world setting up <a href="http://www.rpgseek.com">rpgseek.com</a>. There are less than 400. Not a big deal to do a mass mailing. The original version of &#8220;we change it and you have to keep checking back to see if we changed anything&#8221; is just rude.</p>
<p><strong>2. You can reprint entire unaltered blocks of text from the SRD, including page numbers for reference. </strong></p>
<p>I get that WOTC wants to sell books, but preventing publishers from reprinting power descriptions and the like was just annoying.</p>
<p><strong>2. You may print an OGL and 4E version of the game simultaneously.</strong></p>
<p>This one really annoyed me in the original GSL. If 4E is so much better than 3.5 in every possible way, what harm does a 3.5 version of the same book cause? Clearly no one is going to buy the &#8220;inferior&#8221; version, right?</p>
<p><strong>4. &#8220;Wizards of the Coast&#8221; has final approval on all books published under the GSL. All works must be submitted for approval to the &#8220;Community Standards Department&#8221; before publication. WOTC reserves the right to require edits before release of any offensive material.</strong></p>
<p>Wizards included a vague &#8220;community standards of decency&#8221; clause in the original GSL. Vague is not acceptable. Either you let people print what they want or you demand approval on every product, with feedback to fix the problems. Vague is just too dangerous in this age of litigation.</p>
<p><strong>5. If there is a lawsuit between WOTC and the 3rd party publisher, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitration" target="_blank">arbitration</a> is the venue of choice. Legal costs are determined by the arbiter.</strong></p>
<p>I am not a lawyer, but even I know that lawyers and trials are expensive. Here is the original GSL&#8217;s version of this, &#8220;Licensee will be responsible for all legal costs, including Wizards’ attorneys’ fees, associated with any action required by Wizards to enforce the terms of this License.&#8221; No small company can afford to pay the legal bills during a protracted suit for <em>both sides</em>! It basically made WOTC lawsuit proof from anyone other than a large company. Arbitration is fair, cost-effective idea.</p>
<p><strong>6. Changes to this document are NOT retroactive. All changes require signatories sign the license again. Currently published products do not have to conform to the new requirements</strong></p>
<p>It will be a cold, dark day in Hell before I ever sign a contract that can change without my consent. Of course, it is very unlikely WOTC would do such a thing, but can you afford to take the risk?</p>
<p>Such is my vision for the new 4E GSL. I am sure there are those that disagree with me or think they have a better idea on how to handle these issues. Feel free to make your feelings known in the comments.</p>
<p>Trask, The Last Tyromancer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.livingdice.com/1206/my-vision-for-the-new-4e-game-system-license-gsl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.livingdice.com @ 2012-02-09 01:12:58 by W3 Total Cache -->
